Language interpretation
This release uses a deterministic interpreter for supported English, Hindi and Hinglish requests. An optional server model can use the same strict decision contract when configured later.
Technical trust
Language interpretation is constrained to a closed decision record. Consequential actions remain behind validated application state and explicit citizen confirmation.
This release uses a deterministic interpreter for supported English, Hindi and Hinglish requests. An optional server model can use the same strict decision contract when configured later.
The workflow engine validates the application ID, service, jurisdiction and prerequisites. Interstate transfers require NOC evidence. Active finance requires financier consent.
Structured case state and payment attempts are stored separately from evidence files. Payment keys prevent an unresolved or successful attempt from being duplicated.
These figures come from the automated local test suite for this version. They are engineering checks, not production traffic or government-system results.
The ownership-transfer workflow accepts any registration and destination jurisdiction. Delhi and Karnataka are only one possible example among every supported state and Union Territory.
Seller, buyer, financier, source-state authority and destination-state authority each have a visible responsibility and next action.
Interstate NOC evidence and active-finance consent are enforced before payment. Invalid evidence can be replaced without restarting.
The same application ID and payment attempt survive reload. A second payment remains blocked while the first is reconciled.
Likely OTPs, PINs, card details and identity references are redacted before language interpretation and before a response is displayed. Case access tokens are stored only as hashes. Uploaded synthetic evidence is given a generic stored filename.
No government, identity, bank, court, SMS or email system is connected. Browser voice is an input method only. Payment, submission, deletion and contest actions cannot be authorised by voice alone.